C N S News Scroll

Thursday, September 29, 2011

News Flash: Debates Don't Matter!

I love the fact that Liberals want to be so helpful to Republicans when it comes to selecting the nominee who will challenge Barack Obama in the 2012 election. Liberals go out of their way to suggest that the Republican field of Presidential hopefuls is weak and utterly lacking in anyone who has a real shot at removing Obama from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.



It ranges from slurring morons like Chris Matthews who regularly dips into not only the happy juice, but also into the tried and tired Liberal playbook that Republicans are lacking in intellectual curiosity and are generally flat out stupid. This is nothing new; George W. Bush was a stupid party boy, His father was out of touch with “real people” and Reagan was an amiable dunce according to the geniuses of the mainstream media.

Based on Texas Governor Rick Perry’s recent less than stellar debate performance has brought out a cavalcade of liberal critics wanting to handicap the Republican field. Eugene Robinson, the Kermit the Frog voiced, columnist for the Washington Post, utilized his latest column to declare the entire Republican field as a bunch of dogs.

Here’s the rub for Liberals; Presidential primary debates are meaningless. Earlier this week while subjecting myself the Morning Joe on MSNBC, someone posited a question about the importance of debates to which veteran NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell dismissed the question with no debate with the response, “of course debates are important.” Just so I am perfectly clear even to Mrs. Alan Greenspan (Mitchell) let me re-state my point; PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DEBATES ARE MEANINGLESS.

For political junkies, debates are high entertainment value events and down right fun to discuss. When it comes to picking the eventual nominee, the really don’t matter. Quick question who won the 2008 Republican Presidential primary debates? Believe it or not there were over 20 debates held during the 2008 cycle. Of those, roughly 11 were what I would call “major” debates; meaning there was a wide array of candidates who participated in a media sponsored format and included top-tier candidates. Sorry but Tom Tancredo standing on a stage by himself does not equal a debate for me.

Of those 11 debates, how many did the eventual Republican Presidential candidate John McCain win? Well based on media reports, Congressman Ron Paul won 5 of the 11; Governor Mitt Romney bested the field in 4 of the 11 and Governor Mike Huckabee won 2, leaving John McCain with zip, zero, zilch, nada in the win column. If debates are such a critical piece of the puzzle when it comes to winning the nomination, then how did John McCain ever get the nomination? (Believe me I have asked myself that question any number of times, but not based on his performance in the debates!)

The bottom line for liberal dipwads boils down to this any one of the announced candidates, including Ron Paul, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, hell even Congressman Thaddeus McCotter and unannounced, potential candidates like Sarah Palin, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie or Florida Senator Marco Rubio would be a better choice for President than the current, temporary resident of the White House.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Clueless in Massachusetts,

Former White House financial reform adviser Elizabeth Warren, who recently launched her bid to unseat Republican Senator Scott Brown in Massachusetts, recently rattled off her spin on class warfare.




Here is the transcript of the certifiable Marxist’s comments;

“I hear all this, you know, ‘Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever. No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody.


“You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.


“Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Apparently Ms. Warren is completely oblivious to the point that the person she talks about building the factory and hiring the workers, likely paid a disproportionate amount of the taxes that paid for the roads, the schools and the police and firefighters that she prattles on about.

Ms. Warren thinks nothing of the fact that this person also put their and their families resources at risk to start the factory, with no guarantee that they would be successful and I would bet that they willingly took that risk without a second thought to having their neighbors bail them out if things didn’t work out and the business was not successful! Something I doubt can be said about Ms. Warren and her ilk, seem to think that the government can fix all problems.

Warren apparently can’t comprehend that people of her ilk have buried factory owners in so many layers of ridiculous regulations that the cost of doing business has been skewed so dramatically, that many folks aren’t willing to take the risk of failure, hence the economic struggles we currently find ourselves in.

While RINO Scott Brown is far from an ideal choice, he’s miles ahead of this clueless, drooling moron.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Social Security = Ponzi Scheme

I love the lazy media’s reaction to Governor Rick Perry, Republican Presidential candidate, calling the Social Security system a Ponzi scheme. Naturally they miss the qualification the Perry puts on his comments, that current recipients and those who are poised to join the system have nothing to worry about, but it is the young workers just starting out that are being taken to the cleaners by this huge lie.



For those clueless media types and their Liberal friends who like to scare old people into thinking that anyone who talks about changing Social Security really wants to take it away…let me share this definition of a Ponzi scheme…

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to separate investors, not from any actual profit earned by the organization, but from their own money or money paid by subsequent investors. The perpetuation of the returns that a Ponzi scheme advertises and pays requires an ever-increasing flow of money from investors to keep the scheme going. The system is destined to collapse because the earnings, if any, are less than the payments to investors.

Does any of that sound like Social Security? HELL YES IT DOES! The last I checked, the actual rate of return on the money that people invest in the social security system is about 1 to 1.5 percent. The need for an ever-increasing flow of money sounds oddly familiar when it come to the social security system.

So is Rick Perry some big dumb cowboy, like the lazy media would have you believe, or is the guy right on?

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Follow the Liberal Logic…“Let's take these son of bitches out”

The following is an exercise in Liberal Logic:

Yesterday, while appearing at a Labor Day rally in Michigan, Jimmy Hoffa Jr. the head thug of the Teamsters Union loudly and now famously proclaimed of the Tea Party, “Let's take these son of bitches out”.


Today comes news out of Senator Harry Reid’s state of Nevada, that a currently un-named gunman opened fire inside an IHOP restaurant, wounding six and killing three, including two uniformed members of the National Guard.

Run this through the Liberal Logic machine that claimed that Sarah Palin’s “targeted” Congressional districts, somehow encouraged Jared Loughner to launch a murderous rampage, gunning down innocent bystanders and Congresswomen Gabby Giffords.

So where are the cries of outrage from Harry Reid, DNC Chair Debbie Dumbasdirt-Shultz, Nancy Peolosi and other deranged Liberals, claiming that Hoffa’s fiery rhetoric was the root cause of these terrible, senseless shootings? ***Insert Cricket Sounds Here*** Clearly many members of the military are supporters/members of the Tea Party movement, so it would follow that this shooter was some deranged, union member, hellbent to cap some Tea Party types.

Now do I know for a fact that this shooter was a union member? Or that he heard Jimmy Hoffa’s ridiculous and incendiary comments? No. But when did actual hard facts ever matter to Liberal Logic? They never bothered to get the facts before they launched the attack on Sarah Palin.

Once again, this just another illustration that proves how twisted and illogical the thought processes of Liberals really are.