C N S News Scroll

Friday, July 17, 2015


End of Discussion - How the Left's Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Voters, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun) - Mary Katharine Ham and Guy Benson (Crown Books)

As a recovering radio talk show host, I have opinions…lots of them. But I don’t have an opinion on absolutely everything and I don’t feel the unquenchable need to express my opinion on everything, meaning you aren’t likely to find me chitter-ing away on social media. My thoughts generally take more than 140 characters and my tolerance for dealing with nitwits, who would rather attack me personally than engage in a spirited debate of ideas, has me more often than not refusing to as Glenn Beck puts it, “argue with idiots.”

After reading Fox News contributor Mary Katherine Ham and Town Hall.com editor Guy Benson’s new book, End of Discussion - How the Left's Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Voters, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun) I may be reconsidering and getting ready to armor up and dive back into the fray. It is that sitting on the sidelines that allows those in the perpetually aggrieved class to win without a fight.

Ham and Benson point out just how organized and professional these attack dogs have become. Along the way they have created an attack playbook chalk full of labels and before non-existent “phobias” that they readily slap on those who might have the temerity to disagree or voice a different opinion. Think marriage is between a man and a women then you must be a homophobe…right?

Ham and Benson have the nerve to point out example after example of how, more often than not, the left don’t just disagree differing points of view, they try tooth and nail to stamp out those who disagree and deprive them of their livelihood. With regularity they also point out the hypocrisy of the left when it comes to so many things. The relatively moderate Koch Brothers are evil billionaires hell bet to fund conservatives, but billionaire Tom Steyer spend wads of cash is okay, because he believes what they do when it comes to global warming.

Congressman and former Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan talks about changing the mindset and inspiring men in the inner city through mentoring and he’s labeled a racist using “dog-whistle” politics. Michelle Obama talks about changing the attitudes of “young men sitting on the couch playing video games and dreaming of being ballers and rappers,” and she’s clearly and inspiration to the African America community. Pardon me but…what a crock.

So, yes it is time for this conservative to armor up and get back into the game and engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed! Keep your labels my Liberal friends, you can have your own opinion, but you can have your own facts.  

Sunday, June 7, 2015

The Self-Inflicted Death of Liberalism

The Silencing – How The Left is Killing Free Speech – Kirsten Powers (Regnery)

It used to be that liberals were open to new ideas and would engage in rigorous debate to support their point of view. Not so much anymore. Kirsten Powers, a self described liberal who lays claim to being raised in a liberal household full of that rigorous debate, is columnist for USA Today and The Daily Beast as well as a Fox News contributor, who in her new book makes a solid case that it is the left who are on a mission to kill free speech.

In The Silencing – How The Left is Killing Free Speech, Powers sets the nail in the heart of what she renames the illiberal left and proceeds to drive it home again and again; making her case almost to the point of redundancy. The reaction that she has received from her fellow liberals reiterates her points; rather than trying to engage Powers in a debate the left resorts to name calling.

While the left loves to wrap themselves in the banner of being the smartest people in the room, clearly smarter than the backwards, science hating conservatives; Powers clearly outlines that the left has become as she puts it, “isolated from the marketplace of ideas.” Rather than trying to engage those with differing points of view, the left has been reduced to tactics that involve an almost non-stop creation of “phobias” which created the illusion that those who disagree with the liberal viewpoint are somehow mentally challenged. Thus we get things like homophobe or Islamophobe; which really are nothing but name calling and intimidation.

Rather than challenging conservatives, the left resorts to trying to remove those who dissent from the playing field. How many times have you heard the left call for the firing or removal of those they disagree with? Powers cites nearly countless examples. The problem for the left is this has amounted to a weakening of their ability to make their case and as a result their point of view is dying a slow, painful death of a thousand self-inflicted wounds.

I have engaged numerous, supposedly highly educated college professors, and been able to swat aside their arguments like child’s play; only to be attacked and called names for pointing out their flawed thinking. Because I have a different perspective on things does not make me a denier, a phobic, or a fill in the blank - ____ist of some variety and it’s not my goal to have you removed from the debate, but to make the case why my viewpoint is the correct one; something Powers clearly makes the case that liberals are no longer interested in.  

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Criminal Minds – Clinton Cash

Clinton Cash – The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich – Peter Schweizer (Harper)

The Watergate conspiracy and investigation spawned many things; it brought into vogue so-called investigative journalism and added the famous catch phrase “follow the money” to the lexicon. There is a striking coincidence that Hillary Clinton came of age in Washington during the Watergate era as a member of the House Judiciary Committee staff charged with investigating that scandal. She was later removed from the investigation because she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.”

Bestselling author Peter Schweizer has served up Clinton Cash – The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, in which he details what I can only describe as a series of complex and multi-layered enterprises; that are chock full of cut outs and bag men who seemingly shield the Clinton’s from leaving direct fingerprints. At times this thing reads like a criminal indictment, building a dense series of circumstantial evidence that point directly at the Clinton’s involvement in a lucrative criminal conspiracy.

Bill and Hillary come off like a modern day Bonnie and Clyde without the Tommy guns and certainly without the Mont Blanc pens of white collar criminals, because nothing is ever written down on paper and as far as electronic communications, we know who owns the server. The problem may be that to “follow the money” through the intricate webs of Friends of Bill and Hill, scumbag business types, tin pot dictators and other lowlifes that the Clintons have chosen to do business with, may be just a little too complex for the average, low information, Clinton/Obama voter.

The astounding thing is it is those same people who get jacked up about the Koch brothers, two successful, U.S. citizens who make above board (legal), public donations to support candidates and causes they believe in. Yet they will go out of their way to say there is nothing fishy about the Clintons getting paid massive amounts for speeches or the Clinton Foundation accepting donations from foreign dictators and tyrants, many of whom stand accused of heinous crimes and human rights violations. Laughably those donations often offer these dirt bags a form of International cleansing or legitimacy due to their association with the Clintons.

Schweizer and his team of investigators offer up a densely notated collection of information that ties the Clintons and their associates to what I can only describe as shady dealings. It gives new meaning to Bill Clinton’s recent protestations to NBC News that “I have to pay our bills” when you see the number of sycophants, hangers on, defenders and contributors that have reaped a windfall from their association with the Clintons.

It may be hard to believe after wading through uranium deals, donations from dictators and so many other scummy shenanigans that perhaps the most damning chapter of the book is the one that details the billions of dollars, many of them U.S. taxpayer dollars, of Haitian earthquake relief funds that were in the direct control of Bill and Hillary. While they detailed many grandiose plans to not only rebuild, but also to modernize and bring Haiti into at least the 20th century with new infrastructure and industrial facilities, what we bought with our billions didn’t even come close.

Massive and possibly criminal cost over-runs, shortfalls on promised basics like housing and projects were piles of money were allocated and spent and yet there was nothing delivered abound. Along the way, plenty of Clinton contributors and friends, many often NOT remotely qualified to deliver on the contracts they were rewarded, became staggeringly enriched. Again, follow the money. Five years after the earthquake that devastated the third world nation, much of Haiti remains in a state of disrepair and tens of thousands still live on the street. Why there has not been an audit or accounting of how the taxpayer’s money was spent is a mystery accept to those who understand how the Obama/Democrat, Justice Department operates.

Has Schweizer uncovered that one smoking gun piece that nails the Clintons? No, but he and his team have built a solid case for a much closer, much more detailed examination of the potential corruption of not only U.S. policy, but of the finances and operations of the Clinton Foundation and their associates. Will that happen? Based on the history of the Clintons, I wouldn’t hold my breath.   


Thursday, April 16, 2015

$50 Million Per Patient: The High Cost of Healthcare

The New York Times, hardly a bastion of conservative thought, recently published a piece about the virtually empty U.S. built Ebola clinics in the African nation of Liberia. All part of Community Organizer in Chief Barack Obama’s day late response to the Ebola outbreak in the West African country.

Obama you may recall plodded along while, delaying the U.S. response to the epidemic that saw Liberia hit with 9,862 cases of Ebola which left a devastating 4408 dead. The Times reported that Worldwide there were 25,500 cases and 10,500 dead; so clearly Liberia was at the epicenter of the death toll, accounting for nearly half of the dead.

So Obama’s response was to hire a political hack, Democrat strategist, Ron Klain to be the Ebola Czar who departed just a short time into his projected tenure. Next the Community Organizer decided he would send nearly 3000 members of the military to help set up 11 Ebola Treatment Units (ETU). The United States outlay for this adventure was $1.4 billion.

So…how many patients did this project treat? How Many lives did it save? The grand total is 28. No that’s not a typo…28! Do the math; that works out to be $50 million per patient. These people spend so much time worry about the optics/politics of things that they delayed the response until after the epidemic had peaked.

This should be yet another glaring example of how wrong all those folks who believe that the government has all the answers or solutions to problems. The local, more nimble and largely privately funded response proved to be not only more effective, but also less expensive. Imagine these are the clowns who voted to take over a huge segment of our economy and put themselves in charge of our healthcare.

Government is a large, lumbering, slow moving mess that is not equipped to deal with anything in a timely or effective manner. Private enterprise is a clear cut more effective and cost effective manner for addressing major problems.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Liberal Bias, Locker Room Style

Bias in the Booth – An Insider Exposes How Sports Media Distort the News – Dylan Gwinnn (Regnery Press)

“We’re fast approaching a point where there’s going to be no real difference between Bob Costas and Rachel Maddow. Except one of them is a man. I think.” While that line made me chuckle, what made it not so funny is it was so true. By the way…Rachel Maddow…I hate that guy!

Dylan Gwinn is a sports talk host and in his first book, Bias in the Booth – An Insider Exposes How Sports Media Distort the News he offers up a comprehensive compendium of screaming double standard of liberal bias not just in the media, but in the sports media in particular. While the shot he takes detailed above at Tiny Bob, who is one of the absolute worst when it comes to flaming liberal sportscaster overstating there stupid opinions, Gwinn truly goes deep and detailed when it comes to pointing out the do as I say not as a do hypocrisy of the of the lefties in sports.

While they tout themselves, often straining muscles to reach around and pat themselves on the back for their open mindedness, the fact of the matter is that by most intelligent standards of reality, liberals are they absolute least tolerant people, notably in the media. The sports media is no different. God forbid you have a different opinion or view point on things, because they will bring on the pitchforks and torches and burn you to the ground.

Gwinn cites chapter and verse on topics ranging from Tim Tebow to Michael Sam and racism to Rush Limbaugh; oh wait…according to most sports broadcasters racism and Rush are one and the same. First amendment? Gwinn points out that, yes you have the right to speak your mind…as long as your opinion matches liberal sportscasters in lock step, otherwise, not so much.

Gwinn does a masterful job of dissecting the libs commentary chapter and verse and proving them wrong time after time throughout the book. Therein lies the rub…even when they are hammered with the facts, liberals never apologize for being wrong. I will continue to wait for the five halfwit St. Louis Rams players to apologize for their ridiculous hands up don’t shoot pre-game demonstration, that as now twice been proven to be wrong; once by the grand jury and once by racist, attorney general, Eric Holder’s Justice Department in the Michael Brown case. No…I won’t be holding my breath while I wait.  

Friday, March 6, 2015

The Great Health Care “Fix”

The Patient Will See You Now: the Future of Medicine is in Your Hands – Eric Topol, M.D. (Basic Books)

America’s Bitter Pill – Money, Politics, Backroom Deals and the Fight to Fix Our Broken Healthcare System – Steven Brill (Random House)

Reinventing American Health Care – Ezekiel J. Emanuel (Public Affairs Books)

A staggering amount of ink, paper, hot air and treasure has been expanded in a seemingly never ending debate over how to best improve the current state of the health care in the United States. Some have deluded themselves into buying into the fantasy that the Affordable Care Act, aka; Obamacare was the so-called magic bullet that would once and for all fix the deeply flawed, ridiculously overpriced U.S. Healthcare system.

Unfortunately those delusional folks couldn’t be more wrong; the Obamacare legislation is the worst example of how Congress creates new laws, a mish mash of bad sausage making that slaps together so much contradictory information into a greasy mess of differing constituencies, that does nothing to actually improve care for the patient or lower costs for that sub-par care.

So despite decades of chatter, hand wringing and debate we really haven’t moved the ball. Three new books attempt to tackle the problem and at times bring strikingly similar points of view to bear and at others approach things from diametrically opposite perspectives. In the end only ones comes close to what will actually bring an impactful change to healthcare, albeit one that still has some hole that remain to be filled.

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a physician and bio-ethicist by trade, was one of the architects responsible for the sloppy sausage making that went into Obamacare. His take on fixing healthcare comes in the form of his book Reinventing American Health Care, which is a mix of a clearly misplaced, misguided victory lap for his work on Obamacare and what he envisions as the next steps to continue that process.

Emanuel is a glaring example of a socialized medicine, universal healthcare-type who buys into the belief that government control is the only correct path to the delivery of healthcare. Its sounds like a case of, Obamacare was a good first step, but there is still more work to be done.

Emanuel makes some downright astounding predictions about what he sees as the future of healthcare, including:

·         The end of insurance as we know it – happening by 2025

·         The end of employer sponsored health insurance – happening by 2020

·         The end of health care inflation – happening by2020

·         The emergence of digital medicine and the closure of hospitals – happening by 2020

While I believe some of these predictions, which may be seen as bold by some, will likely happen, it won’t be for the reasons Emanuel lays out. Clearly Obamacare has failed miserably on one of the cornerstone claims that was made about it; reducing the cost of healthcare and health insurance. In fact, costs have continued to not only increase, but increase dramatically. Those costs will make it impossible for businesses, big and small, to continue to provide/underwrite the costs of insuring their employees.

As to ending health care inflation, this one is laughable on its face for a multitude of reasons. The most basic reason is one of the fundamentals of understanding economics, which clearly Emanuel and many in the Obama administration, including the President, don’t quite grasp; supply and demand. We are on the leading edge of aging baby boomers starting to hit the age where they we see the need to utilize health care at a greater rate, thereby increasing the demand, while the supply; doctors, nurses, etc., has remained relatively stagnant or actually decreased; which will lead inevitably to increased costs.

It is only with the emergence of digital medicine that Emanuel comes close to a correct prediction. Dr. Eric Topol delves much more deeply into the impact of the technological evolution and digitization of health care; more on that later.

Journalist and as he makes clear, a broad range participant in the health care system, Steven Brill takes a swing at improving health care by pumping steroids into his already pumped up take on the U.S. healthcare system. Brill expands on his epic 2013 Time magazine article, the 40,000 plus word piece entitled Bitter Pill – Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us, in the form of his new book, America’s Bitter Pill – Money, Politics, Backroom Deals and the Fight to Fix Our Broken Healthcare System.

Like Topol and Emanuel, Brill serves up a heaping helping of heart rendering stories about seemingly ordinary, average, American citizens who have gotten caught up in the staggering costs of the U.S. healthcare system. Anyone who has had a hospital stay or had a family member have a hospital stay to battle disease or illness, simple or complex, has been the recipient of a mind-numbingly complex, nearly impossible to read, let alone understand, medical bill. Depending on the type of illness and course of treatment rendered, maybe more than one bill.

These sob stories have the desired effect; outrage at the high costs involved and a backlash against a seemingly secretive medical industrial complex. Brill’s solution to the problem involves the creation of large, regional health care systems being formed and assuming the role of not only provider, but of insurer for the patients they treat. This model is currently being explored in Western Pennsylvania by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and it’s insurance division. The logic Brill provides is that the insurance arms would keep close watch on the providers and the providers would be loathe to overcharge or over treat the patients covered by the insurance side, thereby keeping costs in line.

The glaring flaw in both Brill’s plan and in that of Emanuel’s socialist approach is that both keep the person purchasing the health care service outside the loop of the decision making process, which is what got us into the position that we find ourselves now firmly locked.

The only author who comes close to actually getting to what will fix the problem with our healthcare system is Eric Topol, M.D., a practicing cardiologist and researcher. In his new book, The Patient Will See You Now: the Future of Medicine is in Your Hands, Topol correctly raises the question, “Is there any other walk of life when services are purchased, but the purchaser does not take ownership?”

The problem stems from the simple fact that the patient, the reason for the service in the first place has been marginalized out of the process by third party insurers and by medical providers. Until we return control of the purchasing decision back to the patient, then the U.S. health care system will continue to be a nightmarish maze of high costs, relatively lousy results and endless problems. With that control back in the hands of the patient/consumer, comes competition for health care dollars and with that competition will come a combination of lower costs and improved service/care.

Brill and Emanuel would prefer to keep control in the hands of a third party who dictates not only what care looks like, but where you can receive it, and how much of it you can receive.

Topol makes the case that it is unlikely that the current system will willingly make the choice to hand control back to the consumer, but it is more likely that the consumer will seize control through the means of digital tools that continue to evolve and become more readily available to the average consumer in the form of smart phones and applications.

While those tools will help consumers to jump back into the process, there is still a role for physicians to play in the prescribing of medications and delivering care not in the traditional hospital setting, but on an outpatient basis which renders another level of control back to the patient. It’s not so much a case of self-medication as it is a better informed consumer making better choices for their own care.

Topol also makes a strong case against what I can only call lazy medicine with doctors doling out meds by the bucketful. Topol spells out in detail the outrageous use of medications, notably the multi-billion dollar scams for things like attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with over $9 billion in prescription drug sales annually and the anti-depressant prescription marketplace, which racks up tens of billions in sales on an annual basis, with most recipients of the meds not meeting even the most basic of medical need for the drugs. It’s doubtful that the real costs of the societal and medical impact of the reach for the prescription pad, better life through chemicals mindset, could ever be truly measured.

Friday, February 27, 2015

Gun News Update

The Washington Examiner is reporting that President Obama is once again planning to take unconstitutional action; this time looking to impose a ban the sale of 5.56 caliber ammunition which is manufactured for the top selling AR-15 Rifle. Even word of the mere speculation of the push for the ban by the bureaucrats at the ATF has driven up prices and gun retailers and has outdoor superstore Cabela’s urging its customers to contact Congress to block the President’s action. Can’t imagine the so-called Republican leadership will do anything but roll over.

Bestselling author John Lott (More Guns Less Crime) authored an excellent rebut to the specious reporting of the New York Times by laying out the facts about the law abiding nature of concealed carry permit holders.